I remember reading the first page of a manuscript that waxed eloquent about how the warmth of the sun felt on the back of the protagonist’s hands as she drove down a quiet early morning lane, the way the taste of the sumptuous strawberry she’d eaten for breakfast lingered on her tongue, how the coolness of the steering wheel beneath her palms made her shiver with delight . . . and that’s about all I remember because by then all I could think about was how refreshing a nice little catnap would be. Sure, sensory details are important, but there’s a method to choosing which ones that will draw in the reader, as opposed to drawing their interest to a quick close. Want to know what it is? I’ve the pleasure of laying it out on the fabulous website, Writing Forward. Check it out!
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Writing Forward: The Myth of All-You-Can-Eat Sensory Details
One Response to Writing Forward: The Myth of All-You-Can-Eat Sensory Details
Order Here
“I’m willing to show good taste, if I can, in somebody else’s living room, but our reading life is too short for a writer to be in any way polite. Since his words enter into another’s brain in silence and intimacy, he should be as honest and explicit as we are with ourselves.” – John Updike

- Jennie Nash: The Making Of A Novel
- Nathan Bransford
- Laurie Abkemeier
- Pub Rants
- Ask Allison Winn
- The Rejecter
- Miss Snark, Gone But Not Forgotten!
- Rachelle Gardner: Rants and Ramblings
- Writer Unboxed
- Meg Cabot
- Caroline Leavitt
- Slushpile
- Karin Gutman: Spirit of Story
- Blog of a Bookslut
- Balls, Buzz & Hype
- Terrible Minds: Irreverent to the Max
![]()
Monthly:
Labels:
academy awards
A Wrinkle in Time
bad books
Burr
character arc
creativity
dopamine
Dr. Laura
duct tape
Eleanor Brown
Elmore Leonard
Frank Sinatra
Gail Collins
Gore Vidal
Happy Meals
Hemingway
inspiration
Jackie Collins
Keith Richards
Marketers
McDonalds
MFA
Michelle Bachmann
Morning Glory
muse
neuroscience
News
proust
screenplay
self-publishing
State of the Union
story
the king's speech
The New York Times
The O.C.
The Weird Sisters
true grit
ts eliot
winter's bone
Wired for Story
words
Writers Groups
Writer Unboxed
Writing Tips
Yardstick







Sound advice. I’m not fond of reading material overdone with sensory details, so why do I insist on putting them in my own drafts? Maybe it’s so I can have a good cry when all those darlings are deleted later on? (And some of them are just so darling.)
Heavy doses of sensory details worked for some of the olden day masters with works 500 pages-plus. Going back to a previous WFS post on Moby Dick, I wonder if in today’s world Mr. Melville wouldn’t gear himself more to 250-300 pages, and a lot of the paring probably via dumping sensory details.